Riots in Urban Areas

As we learned in class, there has been a history of riots taking place in urban areas. Especially in the US, there has been a longstanding history of riots. These acts of civil disorder take place because a group of people become frustrated and, at times, feel forced to resort to violence. Some reasons for the beginning of a riot include poor working conditions, oppression, conflicts between ethnic groups, and government. Riots can range from being relatively harmless all the way to violent and extremely dangerous. Riots are definitely an issue that needs to be addressed. I personally think the best method of this would be preventative measures rather than dealing with effects after a riot. For instance, addressing potential issues such as racial conflicts prior to the outbreak of a riot in urban areas would be best in order to ensure a riot does not occur.

A particularly violent prison riot from the Riot Spreadsheet we worked on in class Tuesday, the New Mexico Penitentiary Riot, took place on February 2 and 3, 1980. Rioting inmates held officers hostage, and took to gruesome acts of violence such as beating, stabbing, and raping. Overall, 33 inmates lost their lives, and least 90 inmates suffered serious injuries. The outbreak is said to have occurred due to security breeches, lack of training for guards, prisoners’ anger and frustration, and disregard of warning signs. As I mentioned above, the deterrence of this tragedy (and others similar to it in the future) lies in preventative measures like attentiveness to warning signs and proper training for all guards and officials.

Here is an interesting link to America’s most destructive riots of all time. Most have a common theme of frustration or conflict between demographic groups that has played a significant role in their occurrence. I believe these destructive riots should truly be an important concern for the government to address, especially in urban areas. If appropriate preventative measures are taken to address the range of reasons causing riots before an outbreak occurs, America will be a safer and much more peaceful place.

Running Riot

            The emergence of riots is an important issue to note when discussing urban public issues because of the damage it can do to cities, both physically and psychologically. The financial burdens resulting in riot-caused destruction of property can weigh heavily on individuals and the government. Furthermore, riots are prone to leave the city in an emotional state of disarray. Group associations shaped by the riot can leave the city divided long after the dust has settled. In her article here, Gabrielle Pickard comments on the cultural effects of the August 2011 riots in England. She notes that public opinion on immigration and minority groups has actually reduced in approval. Riots can also be detrimental will be new perceptions of the city based on violence that can deter future residents and businesses from taking root.

In Steven Wilkinson’s article “Riots” he discusses how important rumors are for initiating and escalating a riot. This becomes increasingly important when such a large portion of the population uses social networking sites that can advance rumors exceptionally fast and efficiently. Similar to the idea of rumors instigating riots, is the idea of other groups of people being inspired by a riot and reproducing it – in essence the “monkey see, monkey do” effect. We have seen in recent years this effect being particularly prominent in countries in the Middle East. This can create a domino effect within a nation or spread to other nations. Jennifer Jackson commented in a post about whether the England riots would ignite tensions in the U.S. She speculated at the time, because of the high unemployment and debt problems that the possibility of a public outbreak would be high; fortunately, as we have seen, this did not occur. 

An image from the London riots. From http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/08/08/144661-london-riots.jpg.

Week 12 Shrinking Cities & Ecological Unconscious

 

For some reason, I believed that all cities were growing. I hadn’t considered the possibility of population decline in urban areas, which is the case in major cities across the world. The loss of jobs in one place obviously causes movement of people to a place with employment, but I naively assumed cities were exempt from this rule since the city itself would still remain. Sports complexes, museums, restaurants, and other public buildings would not be abandoned in a city, but without an industry, the need for these spaces disappears. The controversy over how to handle the vacated areas seems complicated, and only a few hopeful ideas are emerging. A sustainable city would be capable of adapting to fluxes in population, but most cities, especially older cities, were not designed with sustainability in mind. The link below describes a straight-forward plan to make the DC area more sustainable.

http://dc.streetsblog.org/2009/08/21/d-c-city-government-considers-cash-for-close-in-urban-living/

This plan moves employees closer to their work establishment. It also promotes the use of public transportation.

The ecological unconscious is a term I had not heard before this class. I took a writing course that emphasized the important bond between man and nature, but I am still surprised that society can, and will, recognize the relationship. I believe nature is the most important affecter of human life and also the most ignored. Hopefully more merit will be given to the idea that the Earth is intertwined with the human being.

A superfund site in Michigan for liquid disposal >> these are the types of structures that may ultimately wake up your ecological unconscious

Driven To Spend (Sprawling)

Mix of land uses, clustering and centeredness, compactness; all of these things are different indications and instances of sprawl. Sprawl drives up the cost of transportation for households because greater distances between destinations and lack of transportation sources. Sprawling is more of a problem in suburban areas where there are gated communities or neighborhoods that have been established in places where there is uncultivated land and nothing around for miles at a time which causes the homeowners there to have to travel long distances to get to what they need and where they need to be. This causes households to have to own and operate more than one automobile. In more metropolitan areas the sprawl is not that expensive because there are more choice of transportation, through buses, taxis, subway systems, walking, or biking. With transportation cost being so high, households are not benefiting or gaining any value in property from buying vehicles the way they would have if they bought a house instead which increases in property value overtime. More people need to pick home where they save money on driving and are in a good neighborhood that suits the needs of their families and their lifestyle. Transportation is expensive regardless of where you live, but a difference in the prices can vary. Having to transport yourself in your own vehicle cost much more than taking the bus, taxi, or subway. When you use public transportation, you pay the standard fare and get to where you need to go. With your own vehicle you have to pay for gas, tune-ups, repairs, up-keep, and maintenance. Those cost add up and increase the amount of money being spent on transportation. Sprawling does nothing to help low income families, it effects them the most and the hardest, they spend about 36% of their income on transportation after taxes.

"Pros and Cons of Urban Sprawl"

http://homeguides.sfgate.com/pros-cons-urban-sprawl-1717.html

Sustainable Building and Ecological Intelligence

Recently in class we have been focusing on sustainable building. Sustainability is not just about energy efficiency, it involves the conversation of our many resources and preserving healthy lives and a healthy planet. Maurice Strong, well renowned global environmentalist and previously Executive Director of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) once stated:  

            “After all, sustainability means running the global environment - Earth Inc. - like a corporation: with depreciation, amortization and maintenance accounts. In other words, keeping the asset whole, rather than undermining your natural capital.” (Strong) http://www.betterworldheroes.com/pages-s/strong-quotes.htm

Today there is an ever more global movement towards the sustainability of our planet and living green. Although green is many times abused as a marketing strategy for companies, I feel as though there is great importance in becoming a more sustainable planet. Being sustainable involves everything from the air we breathe to the amount of utilities we use, and the conscious efforts we make to allocate our natural resources to provide for most efficient use. Although we have seen this green movement affect every aspect of our lives down to the marketing of the products we buy, one industry making a major impact in the sustainability of our planet is the housing and construction industry. They are implementing many innovations including:

• Passive solar heat through energy efficient windows
• Compact fluorescent and LED light bulbs which are far more efficient 
• The use of grey water
• Using recycled materials 
• Better insulation
• More efficiency building materials including "earthpack"
• The use of not only efficient HVAC systems, but the additional use of air ventilation systems. There is a lot of indoor air pollution in our homes.
• The use of building materials which are "low in off gases" and and other dangerous air pollutants such as Volatile Organic Compounds.

Daniel Goleman, Industrial Ecologist and author of "Ecological Intelligence", stated that there needs to be a mass movement to utilize these practices and work toward 100% sustainability throughout the entire supply chain, because although these products allow for more sustainability, any product that has had a long chain of supply through manufacturers is not in fact 100% sustainable. Goleman, Daniel. Ecological Intelligence: the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy. New York: Broadway, 2010. Print. Goleman stated that even to make t shirts of "100% organic cotton", dangerous pesticides are used which consist of chlorinated hydrocarbons. He explains that we need a mass movement toward sustainability for all manufacturers and work toward developing a sustainable globe. I agree with Daniel Goleman in that we should be working toward a sustainable planet. Although his vision is ideal, I do not think that it is easily feasible in a timely manner. I think that we should implement more sustainable practices in our manufacturing industry just as the construction industry has been doing. So that one day we can all work toward a more sustainable planet.

Week 9- Transportation-Related Challenges

In Ralph Buehler’s article “Determinants of Transport Mode Choice: A Comparison of Germany and the USA” published in the Journal of Transport Geography, the author addresses the motorization rates in Germany and the US. Studies show that Germans make a four times higher share of trips using “green” methods of transportation (walking, biking, etc.) Delving deeper into the issue to discover why this may be, Buehler discovers that a lack of biking and walking friendly paths may be part of the issue. Many destinations in the US are accessible only by car, forcing many to drive. In addition to this problem, gas taxes and registration fees are lower in the US than they are in Germany, reducing incentive for Americans to use green methods of transportation. Also, parking is cheap and generally readily available, and road construction and maintenance are subsidized at a higher rate. These aspects present a significant obstacle for the US in reducing vehicle-related greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.

In an article published in Time: Moneyland magazine, author Brad Tuttle discusses the gap between Germans and Americans (http://moneyland.time.com/2010/09/27/why-you-should-behave-less-like-an-american-and-more-like-a-german/). He believes the gap is due to cultural differences. I find this to be an interesting thesis. While I agree with Buehler in the aforementioned article, I also think the dramatic difference between the transportation choices made by Germans versus Americans is partly behavioral. The way we are raised plays a large role in the choices we will make for the rest of our lives. For instance, if we are raised by parents in an area where we can walk to places like school, the grocery store, and shops, we are likely to develop the same habits and continue to do so, if possible. But unfortunately, most Americans are raised in suburban towns plagued by urban sprawl that force them to be very auto-dependent.

With all that being said, the issue at hand is a serious one that needs feasible solutions now. The first step for the US is creating the infrastructure for walking and cycling so that people can choose to use these green methods of transportation if they desire. Other regulations like increasing incentive to walk or bike, can then be proposed. Portland, Oregon is very pedestrian friendly, and can be used as a model for other cities to add the proper infrastructure for walking and cycling.

Safer Roadways and the Elderly

The issue of elderly drivers in America is a controversial one. The issue of accidents caused by the elderly has sparked many plans to counteract their lessened physical capabilities including having the elderly renew their driver’s license at the DMV every few years. Some have gone as far as proposing a maximum driving age – similar to the minimum legal age to drive. So far neither of these concepts have been widespread, instead city planners have focused on making their roadways safer to prepare for lesser drivers.

It has been documented that less accidents occur on highways and interstate roads. Due to this, in his article at http://www.pps.org/blog/wider-straighter-and-faster-not-the-solution-for-older-drivers/, Gary Toth states that city planners have been trying to emulate highways since 1966 in order to reduce accidents. Planners have been making roads straighter and wider like highways. Unfortunately, this has proved counterproductive, as these new roads invoke drivers to speed unnecessarily and cause an increase in accidents. While higher speeds are not as detrimental on interstates, in pedestrian areas with lots of intersections this has demonstrated poorly.

            What cities have been doing has proven ineffective, and new measurements are needed. New plans call for courses that naturally reduce the speed limit. The elderly are at much less risk to themselves and others when they, and other drivers, are driving at a slower speed. At a slower speed, everyone has more time to react. Other plans of action such as roundabouts can greatly reduce fatalities and major injuries.